Motivation, Learning and Risk
Motivation, like studying shouldn’t be a impartial idea. How one thinks motivation and studying work, is immediately linked to ones’ worldview, psychology of targets and one’s principle of understanding (epistemology). For instance, if one holds a behaviourist view about motivation one believes that people are motivated just by inputs to create outputs. This mechanistic worldview creates a system primarily based on this perception and then wonders why isn’t works. As soon as the worldview has been normalized because it has been in safety, it creates monumental strain (cognitive dissonance) to reject such a view and even query it. Certainly, what Security does is demonise any view aside from such a view below the rubric of compliance/engineering and by making the framework for studying binary, stifling studying and open enquiry. The binary ideology of zero is the best inhibitor of studying certainly, studying can by no means advance in any group anchored to zero.
This has large implications for understanding why folks do what they do. Extra so, within the risk and safety world we see how this has formed occasion rationalization and how such a view rationalizes resolution making. What follows is an investigation technique developed on the premise of a behaviourist assumption that matches the character of occasions to its assumption. Most safety investigations strategies work like this. Most safety investigation strategies form the messiness of human exercise to a assemble order and linearity that doesn’t exist, however it makes for a fast and tidy end result that almost all typically misrepresents what occurred.
The primary query we have to ask of any investigation technique is: what methodology of motivation and studying is assumed within the technique?
There are quite a few theories of motivation eg. Moslow’s, Herzberg’s, Expectancy Principle, McGregor’s, Moskowitz’ and Higgins. Equally, there are numerous theories of studying as represented right here: https://www.teachthought.com/learning/a-visual-summary-the-most-important-learning-theories/. I’ve mentioned this earlier than in relation to investigations methodologies https://safetyrisk.net/what-theory-of-learning-is-embedded-in-your-investigation-methodology/ ). Most in safety could be shocked that there are such a lot of contested methodologies related to motivation and studying. Simply learn any safety work on studying and you’ll discover a simplistic assumption that studying is singular, goal and uniform. All of this ‘wickedity’ about studying and motivation is 101 for the Schooling career certainly, such data is important for professionalism. Placing one’s head within the proverbial sand of simplistic wishful considering shouldn’t be being skilled.
So, when Security talks about studying or motivation the primary query needs to be: what principle of studying and motivation are you referring to? You received’t hear this query being requested in safety.
Sadly, you received’t discover any refined dialogue of motivation or studying in Security. Such is the dynamic of behaviourism (https://safetyrisk.net/the-curse-of-behaviourism/ ) within the safety trade that it holds again any method to advance understanding of studying and motivation. A behaviourist technique will get a behaviourist end result however it by no means represents an open enquiry.
Within the Social Psychology of Risk (SPoR) we method studying and motivation from the angle of Socialitie, the idea that human individuals function in relational dialectic with themselves, others and the environment. Individuals, no matter reward and punishment, are way more motivated by which means, objective and relational management. As a great begin is to learn Higgins, T., (2012) Past Pleasure and Ache. Oxford. London.
Nevertheless, some issues are fairly positive about standard beliefs in safety about motivation, these are:
- Individuals are NOT motivated by paperwork!
- Individuals are NOT motivated by damage charges!
- Individuals are NOT motivated by policing!
But what does Security most do? These three issues. How does this make sense?
Newest posts by Dr Rob Lengthy (see all)
PhD., MEd., MOH., BEd., BTh., Dip T., Dip Min., Cert IV TAA, MRMIA
Rob is the founding father of Human Dymensions and has intensive expertise, {qualifications} and experience throughout a variety of sectors together with authorities, schooling, company, trade and group sectors over 30 years. Rob has labored in any respect ranges of the schooling and coaching sector together with serving on numerous publish graduate government, publish graduate supervision, publish graduate course design and implementation packages.